LoL players bombard Ahri with targeted bans to protest divisive new Faker skin

League players are boycotting the skin.

Hall of Legends Ahri Premium edition splash art for League of Legends
Image via Riot Games

Faker’s controversial Hall of Legends Ahri skin is now available in League of Legends. Some players have already undoubtedly cashed out on the expensive skin and spent their hard-earned money on repping Faker, but we doubt they have even had the chance to use it yet.

Recommended Videos

Ahri’s ban rate in solo queue has skyrocketed since the Faker bundle released. At the time of writing, the champion has a ban rate of up to 16 percent in some ranks. It’s doubled and even tripled in some cases, according to a League stats site, LoLalytics.

Those following League in recent weeks shouldn’t be surprised by this sudden uptick in ban rate. League players were up in arms after Riot Games announced the $450 price tag of Faker’s Hall of Legends bundle.

Faker walking through the crowd in the LCK.
Maybe Faker will finally use a skin. Photo via Riot Games

Faker was awarded a physical trophy to coincide with the Hall of Legends event. To add insult to injury, it looked noticeably damaged, angering League players even more.

Riot Games defended its decision to set the expensive price tag for the new bundle. In an interview at Summer Game Fest, League director Pu Liu said most players enjoy Riot’s games “for zero dollars,” trying to justify the price.

Liu compared spending money on League to buying things like Warhammer figures. But honestly, we’d feel much better spending hundreds of dollars on physical items instead of skins in an online video game. And it seems many players agree.

Author
Image of Mateusz Miter
Mateusz Miter
Freelance Writer at Dot Esports. Mateusz previously worked for numerous outlets and gaming-adjacent companies, including ESL. League of Legends or CS:GO? He loves them both. In fact, he wonders which game he loves more every day. He wanted to go pro years ago, but somewhere along the way decided journalism was the more sensible option—and he was right.