Starfield’s controversial $7 questline only has around 20 minutes of gameplay

Letdown would be an understatement.

A Mysterious Tracker waiting for a player in Starfield.
Screenshot by Dot Esports

Bethesda keeps adding content to Starfield, and its latest release is a $7 “Bounty Hunter” questline. When you pay money for new content in video games, you expect it to be worthwhile, but that’s clearly not the case in this case.

Recommended Videos

In a review of the quest, Kotaku said it took them just 20 minutes to complete. It’s also apparently only available to purchase via in-game currency, meaning you must spend $10 before buying the Bounty Hunter content.

Kotaku said the questline is basically a series of simple “go and kill” tasks. Given it’s named Bounty Hunter, we’re hardly surprised. But we still expected some complexity or intrigue in a $7 quest. “[It] just consists of mowing people down,” according to Kotaku.

A player wearing the Starborn Gravis Suit in Starfield.
Waste of money. Screenshot by Dot Esports

The new Starfield content highlights an issue the game has struggled with since its September 2023 release. Despite being arguably the biggest role-playing title in history, it’s filled with bleak storylines and tasks, which can become tiresome quickly.

Fortunately for Starfield fans, Bethesda has a history of fixing its games and making them playable and enjoyable. Just look at Fallout 76. Its initial launch in 2018 was a disaster, plagued by bugs and performance issues. But now, it’s a lot of fun—albeit six years later.

With that in mind, maybe there’s hope for Starfield. But it doesn’t look like it’s going in the right direction with this Bounty Hunter quest.

Author
Image of Mateusz Miter
Mateusz Miter
Freelance Writer at Dot Esports. Mateusz previously worked for numerous outlets and gaming-adjacent companies, including ESL. League of Legends or CS:GO? He loves them both. In fact, he wonders which game he loves more every day. He wanted to go pro years ago, but somewhere along the way decided journalism was the more sensible option—and he was right.